Reviews & Guides · Outdoor Gear

Decathlon Kiprun MT3: roomy fit and wet-trail grip

Reviewed: Decathlon Kiprun MT3Regional reference: Kiprun MT3 (United Kingdom)

I found the Kiprun MT3 much roomier than the MT Cushion 2, with reliable wet-mud grip and quick-drying breathability on my first mountain test.

A person's foot wearing a black, grey, and white Kiprun MT3 Trail running shoe resting sideways on a weathered wooden log along a dirt path.
A top-down view of a hiker standing on a dirt trail covered with fallen leaves, wearing a hydration pack and holding a pair of trekking poles in hand.
A hiker wearing an orange rain poncho uses trekking poles while ascending a muddy, rocky trail through a dense forest, with another hiker in a light-colored raincoat visible ahead on the path.
A hiker wearing a light athletic shirt, running vest, and shorts sits on a large boulder etched with a line drawing of a fish. Holding trekking poles across his lap, he poses in front of lush green trees, with his face covered by a cartoon cloud sticker.
Hikers wearing rain ponchos descend a muddy, rocky forest trail surrounded by lush green trees on a rainy day.
A rear view of a man walking down a wet street lined with buildings and parked cars, wearing a trail running hydration pack and carrying trekking poles, with mud stains on his shirt and shorts.

A late note about a new pair of shoes.

Let me give anyone thinking of buying them the conclusion first: yes, buy them.

The toe box is very wide. I first bought the MT Cushion 2, but after trying them on, the MT3 was clearly much roomier and far more comfortable—the Cushion 2 pressed against the inside of my arch. It also looks more versatile with different outfits.

I finally tested them on the mountain today; it has been raining here recently.

First, the most basic point is grip. Although the shoes do not use Vibram soles, I personally found them even grippier than ordinary Vibram soles. I did not try them on wet moss, but I had no problems descending on wet, muddy, sandy ground during the rainy second half of the outing, including while running for a few stretches. I have heard that the outsole’s durability is only average, so that still needs a longer test; people say it has been improved substantially.

The cushioning is very good. They use high-density foam, and the official description mentions K-Only and says the shoes can adapt to different kinds of stride. They feel as if they would suit someone like me, who does more hiking than running.

The upper is very breathable—water poured straight in—but it also dried fairly quickly. Durability seemed good too: Liupan Mountain has many jagged, rocky sections, and the shoes caused me no problems.

Overall, I think this is a pair of shoes worth buying. The original price was 599 yuan, and by waiting for a promotion I could get them for a little over 400 yuan. Compared with certain K and S brands, the value is still much better, and Decathlon’s extensive after-sales service makes the purchase feel especially secure.

Source: 老高在干嘛 · Xiaohongshu · 2024-04-20 · 迪卡侬mt3越野跑鞋实战. Search this Chinese title in Xiaohongshu to find the original post.

Before You Buy

Models in your region

The owner’s shoe is identified as the Decathlon Kiprun MT3. The official UK listing is also for Kiprun MT3, but it specifies a medium-width, 8 mm-drop, non-waterproof version; the exact regional configuration worn by the owner is not recorded, so the fit and feature experience should not be transferred to every market version without checking the local listing.

Model in this review Related regional model What to know
Kiprun MT3 Kiprun MT3 (United Kingdom) This is the same Kiprun MT3 family used by the owner. The UK listing describes a medium-width, 8 mm-drop, non-waterproof shoe, while the owner reported a roomy fit and strong wet-mud grip; the exact configuration behind the owner’s pair is not specified.
Model in this review
Kiprun MT3
Related regional model
Kiprun MT3 (United Kingdom)
What to know
This is the same Kiprun MT3 family used by the owner. The UK listing describes a medium-width, 8 mm-drop, non-waterproof shoe, while the owner reported a roomy fit and strong wet-mud grip; the exact configuration behind the owner’s pair is not specified.

Fit: compare the MT Cushion 2 carefully

The owner found the MT3 substantially roomier than the MT Cushion 2 and said the earlier shoe pressed against the inside of the arch. That is a useful fit comparison for shoppers considering both models, but it remains one wearer’s try-on result rather than a measured width comparison.

The UK Kiprun MT3 listing identifies the shoe as medium width. Because the owner’s market, size and foot measurements are not recorded, readers with unusually wide feet should confirm the local size chart and try-on or returns policy rather than treating the owner’s comfortable fit as universal.

Wet trails: promising grip, no waterproofing

On the owner’s rainy mountain outing, the MT3 handled wet, muddy, sandy downhill sections and several short running stretches without reported slipping. The owner did not test wet moss, so the account does not establish grip across every slippery trail surface.

The UK product page labels the Kiprun MT3 non-waterproof. That fits the owner’s observation that water entered readily through the breathable upper; buyers wanting rain protection should treat quick drying as a different benefit from waterproofing.

Cushioning and trail use

The owner described the cushioning as very good and linked the high-density foam and K-Only positioning with a preference for hiking more than running. This supports the shoe as a candidate for mixed hiking and trail-running use, not a measured conclusion about impact protection or long-distance performance.

The official UK listing gives the Kiprun MT3 an 8 mm drop. The source account does not state its size, drop preference or mileage, so readers should use the published specification for regional selection rather than infer that the owner’s stride experience applies to every runner.

Durability remains the open question

The owner reported no problems on jagged rocky sections and said the upper dried fairly quickly after getting wet. However, outsole longevity was not established: the owner had only heard that durability might be average and said a longer test was still needed.

For buyers choosing the MT3 for frequent rocky or wet use, the practical unknown is how long the outsole will retain its grip. The owner’s first outing supports immediate trail performance, but not a mileage-based durability recommendation.