How It Fared

See what buyers in China learned first.

Reviews & Guides · Kitchen & Dining

My Comandante C40 and MAVO Phantox Pro grind-setting comparison

Reviewed: Comandante C40, MAVO Phantox ProRegional reference: Comandante C40 (United States and Europe through manufacturer-listed dealers); MAVO Phantox Pro (United States and Europe via manufacturer international store)

I compared five of my usual Comandante C40 settings with the MAVO Phantox Pro; each C40 step corresponded to about 0.4 more on my Pro dial.

The owner’s black MAVO Phantox Pro and racing-green Comandante C40 with an orange grounds jar stand above five pairs of ground coffee. The sheet pairs C40 settings 20–24 with the original online Pro references 7.5, 7.8, 8.2, 8.6 and 9.0; the next photo adds the owner’s adjusted readings.
The owner’s five paired ground-coffee samples are arranged by C40 settings 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24. The middle column gives online Phantox Pro reference readings 7.5, 7.8, 8.2, 8.6 and 9.0; the added “After adjustment” column gives the owner’s final readings 7.6, 8.0, 8.4, 8.8 and 9.2.
A reference screenshot from another Xiaohongshu account, 文刀刃在饮咖, shows a theoretical C40-to-MAVO Phantox Pro comparison table. Rows 10–32 list C40 clicks, axial spacing in millimeters and a Pro column with a cropped heading. The screenshot’s lower caption also names other grinders.

My starting reference was a comparison chart on Xiaohongshu that had generated a lot of discussion and likes. I compared only the five C40 settings I use most often, from 20 to 24. My final results were:
C40 20 → Phantox Pro 7.6
C40 21 → Phantox Pro 8.0
C40 22 → Phantox Pro 8.4
C40 23 → Phantox Pro 8.8
C40 24 → Phantox Pro 9.2

For me, each one-step increase on the C40 corresponded to about 0.4 more on the Phantox Pro dial. That differs a little from what other users measured, which is normal.

I’ve had the C40 for six months, and it really does bring me joy. The racing-green grinder with an orange grounds canister looks so good! It’s fantastic for washed coffee.

The Phantox is genuinely great and reliable in use. I have high hopes for MAVO and can’t wait for the official release of the Guangqu scale—I really want one.

Source: 77ccino🍅 · Xiaohongshu · 2026-04-21 · 自己的C40和幻刺pro研磨度对齐🤌🏻🤌🏼🤌🏽. Search this Chinese title in Xiaohongshu to find the original post.

Before You Buy

Models in your region

The owner names a Comandante C40 and the MAVO Phantox Pro. Those names correspond to the official product families listed for the US and Europe, but the C40 generation and burr subtype are not identified, so the owner’s dial comparison should be treated as a personal reference rather than a model-wide conversion.

Model in this review Related regional model What to know
Comandante C40 Comandante C40 (United States and Europe through manufacturer-listed dealers) The official US and European listings include the C40 family, but the owner’s generation, burr subtype and click mechanism are not established. The reported 20–24 settings therefore apply to the owner’s grinder, not necessarily every C40 variant.
MAVO Phantox Pro MAVO Phantox Pro (United States and Europe via manufacturer international store) The official US and European listing identifies the Phantox Pro and specifies 120 external-adjustment clicks per turn. The owner’s 7.6–9.2 readings are dial settings, not microns or a universal conversion from C40 settings.
Model in this review
Comandante C40
Related regional model
Comandante C40 (United States and Europe through manufacturer-listed dealers)
What to know
The official US and European listings include the C40 family, but the owner’s generation, burr subtype and click mechanism are not established. The reported 20–24 settings therefore apply to the owner’s grinder, not necessarily every C40 variant.
Model in this review
MAVO Phantox Pro
Related regional model
MAVO Phantox Pro (United States and Europe via manufacturer international store)
What to know
The official US and European listing identifies the Phantox Pro and specifies 120 external-adjustment clicks per turn. The owner’s 7.6–9.2 readings are dial settings, not microns or a universal conversion from C40 settings.

How to use the owner’s setting map

The owner’s five photographed pairs offer a starting point for comparing familiar settings: C40 20–24 matched with Phantox Pro readings 7.6, 8.0, 8.4, 8.8 and 9.2. The owner says the initial reference came from a popular Xiaohongshu chart and that the resulting map differed slightly from other users’ measurements. No controlled particle-size or coffee-extraction measurements are reported, so use the numbers as this owner’s reference—not as a guaranteed equivalence for another grinder or brewing recipe.

MAVO specifies 120 external-adjustment clicks per full turn for the Phantox Pro, but that specification does not validate the owner’s cross-grinder mapping. The C40’s generation and click mechanism are also unknown, which prevents a more exact setting-to-setting comparison for buyers.

What the owner says about daily use

After six months with the C40, the owner praised its racing-green finish paired with an orange grounds canister and said it worked very well for washed coffee. That is a personal preference and reported use case, not a comparative brewing test.

The owner also described the Phantox Pro as reliable and enjoyable to use. The account does not specify how long the owner has used it or report a durability test, so it supports a positive firsthand impression but not a broader reliability conclusion.

Related Reading