Reviews & Guides · Kitchen & Dining
My four ceramic drippers: HARIO Alpha, V60, Shanwen 62 and Coffee Flower
Reviewed: HARIO V60 ceramic dripper (source size unspecified), HARIO Alpha Series Dripper 01 (ceramic), Shanwen 62 dripper, Source maker unconfirmed Coffee Flower dripper (author’s Xuanwu/Shandao label)Regional reference: HARIO V60 ceramic dripper (source size unspecified) (United States); HARIO Alpha Series Dripper 01 (ceramic) (United States)
I compared four ceramic drippers with washed Panama SL28. The Alpha felt weightier than my V60; I also compared Shanwen 62 and Coffee Flower.
I use these four fast-flow cone drippers most often. All four are ceramic; I wanted to minimize differences from heat capacity, thermal conductivity and weight, and treated those effects as negligible. In terms of flow, the V60 is broadly similar to the Shanwen 62 and Xuanwu/Shandao drippers; for convenience, I call the latter the Coffee Flower dripper here. That comparison with the V60 applies to the resin V60.
For this comparison, I used a ceramic V60 to make the tasting as parallel as possible. Because of the ceramic firing process, its ribs do not protrude as sharply as those on a resin V60, so flow is a little slower, though the difference is negligible. The sensory difference is slight too. The V60 has 24 ribs in the upper section and 12 in the lower section; the Shanwen has 12 at the top, 24 in the middle and 12 at the bottom. I always find the V60’s mouthfeel slightly less satisfying than the Shanwen’s. The V60 opens at 60 degrees, the Shanwen at 62 degrees, and the paper filter at 61.5 degrees, so the paper fits the Shanwen more closely. In my view, that always makes extraction more even and the cup softer and more viscous. The V60 can taste a little watery—especially with a single-main-pour technique—but it is also refreshing and clean.
Comparing the Shanwen 62 with the Shanwen Coffee Flower dripper, the 62 is faster overall, particularly in the middle and later parts of extraction. The flow chart shows the Coffee Flower slowing down toward the end. In my tasting, coffee from the Coffee Flower had more cling and viscosity, with slightly more body. The Shanwen 62 kept its body and coating mouthfeel while leaving a very clean finish.
Comparing HARIO’s V60 with the Alpha dripper, the Alpha is a little faster overall, though its late-stage filtration is slightly slower. The Alpha has 12 ribs in the upper section and 24 in the lower section. With a single-main-pour technique, the water pressure drops as the water level falls, so the extra ribs do not speed up filtration—much as with the Shanwen. In my tasting, the Alpha gave the coffee more weight on the tongue and more viscosity than the V60, while also making the flavors clearer.
For this test, I used a washed Panama SL28. All four drippers made enjoyable coffee, with clear berry notes and a clean, refreshing character.
Any of the four drippers can be a good choice; it depends on your sensory preferences. They all have relatively fast flow and can make clean, refreshing coffee with layers that change as it cools. The recessed-rib design can help the paper fit the dripper more closely. There is no single right or wrong choice—each one works well.
Source: 徐维泽 · Xiaohongshu · April 16, 2025 · 关于4款锥形快流速旁通滤杯的流速以及感官. Search this Chinese title in Xiaohongshu to find the original post.
Before You Buy
Models in your region
HARIO’s ceramic Alpha and ceramic V60 have US counterparts. The source’s Shanwen 62 and Coffee Flower names are retained as comparison objects; their overseas counterparts are unconfirmed.
| Model in this review | Related regional model | What to know |
|---|---|---|
| HARIO V60 ceramic dripper (source size unspecified) | HARIO V60 ceramic dripper (source size unspecified) (United States) | The US ceramic V60 uses a conical body and spiral ribs. The cited 01 listing is for 1–2 cups; the source does not give its V60 size. |
| HARIO Alpha Series Dripper 01 (ceramic) | HARIO Alpha Series Dripper 01 (ceramic) (United States) | The owner’s ceramic Alpha corresponds to the US ceramic Alpha Series Dripper 01, listed as model ADC-01-B. HARIO also lists separate Tritan versions; the owner’s comparison is about the ceramic model. |
- Model in this review
- HARIO V60 ceramic dripper (source size unspecified)
- Related regional model
- HARIO V60 ceramic dripper (source size unspecified) (United States)
- What to know
- The US ceramic V60 uses a conical body and spiral ribs. The cited 01 listing is for 1–2 cups; the source does not give its V60 size.
- Model in this review
- HARIO Alpha Series Dripper 01 (ceramic)
- Related regional model
- HARIO Alpha Series Dripper 01 (ceramic) (United States)
- What to know
- The owner’s ceramic Alpha corresponds to the US ceramic Alpha Series Dripper 01, listed as model ADC-01-B. HARIO also lists separate Tritan versions; the owner’s comparison is about the ceramic model.
Pouring flow and coffee flow are different readings
The source includes separate charts for pouring flow and coffee-liquid flow, both in g/s. A similar pouring profile does not mean the liquid leaves each dripper at the same rate. The two-minute chart window should not be read as a stated total brew time.
The all-ceramic setup was the owner’s attempt to reduce material differences, not proof that heat capacity, conductivity or weight were controlled. Exact dose, water ratio and grinder settings are unstated. The rib-and-angle explanation is the owner’s interpretation; the post provides no extraction-yield measurement to establish the proposed cause.


